<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Notes from Phazm &#187; browser compatibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phazm.com/notes/category/browser-compatibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phazm.com/notes</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 09:46:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Feb 12th, 2008 &#8211;  A Glorious Day!</title>
		<link>http://www.phazm.com/notes/productivity/feb-12th-2008-a-glorious-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.phazm.com/notes/productivity/feb-12th-2008-a-glorious-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hughes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IE6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser compatibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phazm.com/notes/productivity/feb-12th-2008-a-glorious-day/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NO MORE Internet Explorer 6!
Update: For a select few  
IE6 is being phased out with a mandatory push from Microsoft, requiring all computers to upgrade to IE7.
The article from Microsoft mentions several ways you can disable the WGA-free update, so the war might not be over. But in my opinion, this is a major [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="alert">NO MORE Internet Explorer 6!</p>
<p><small>Update: For a select few <img src='http://www.phazm.com/notes/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </small></p>
<p>IE6 is being phased out with a mandatory push from Microsoft, requiring all computers to upgrade to IE7.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946202" title="No more IE6">article from Microsoft</a> mentions several ways you can disable the WGA-free update, so the war might not be over. But in my opinion, this is a major step forward.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.phazm.com/notes/productivity/feb-12th-2008-a-glorious-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 3 &amp; Web Developers</title>
		<link>http://www.phazm.com/notes/browser-compatibility/firefox-3-web-developers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.phazm.com/notes/browser-compatibility/firefox-3-web-developers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hughes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[browser compatibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phazm.com/notes/browser-compatibility/firefox-3-web-developers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
While it pains me to do so, the following warning is needed:
This entry best viewed in Firefox 3
Since Mozilla released the Firefox 3 Beta (Code Name: Minefield) there have been a rash of blog posts regarding the many new features, increased security, and enhanced UI. However, one thing I have yet to see is what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="/images/blog/ff3/minefield-icon.png" alt="Minefield (Firefox Beta)" class="fr" />
<p><small>While it pains me to do so, the following warning is needed:</small></p>
<p class="alert">This entry best viewed in Firefox 3</p>
<p>Since Mozilla released the Firefox 3 Beta (Code Name: Minefield) there have been a rash of blog posts regarding the many new features, increased security, and enhanced UI. However, one thing I have yet to see is what I am really need to know: how does this affect web developers?</p>
<span id="more-13"></span>
<div class="adunit"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-5882049241465959";
google_ui_features = "rc:";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = "468x60_as";
google_ad_type = "text_image";
google_alternate_ad_url = "?adsensem-benice=468x60";
google_color_border = "FFFFFF";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "A3C088";
google_color_text = "333333";
google_color_url = "";

//--></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"></script>
</div>
<p>When I heard that Safari was releasing a PC version of their browser, I was overjoyed... <q>Now I don't need to boot up my Mac to test sites in Safari, right?</q> Well, as we all know, the answer to that very naive assumption is a resounding "Not even close" - We now have just one <strong>more</strong> browser we need to test in. <small>(Note: Safari did clean up its act a bit since release, but it's still not exactly the same as its Mac counterpart, and thus is simply more work.)</small></p>
<p>I had my apprehensions when I heard Firefox was jumping up a full version... I was determined to not make the same foolish mistake twice... So I did my research.</p>
<p>Good news? It passes the <a href="http://www.webstandards.org/files/acid2/test.html" rel="nofollow" title="Acid2 Test">Acid2 test</a>!</p>
<div class="thumbrow"> <a href="/images/blog/ff3/acid-ff2.png" title="Firefox 2 Acid2 Results" rel="lightbox[acid]"><img src="/images/blog/ff3/acid-ff2-th.png" alt="Firefox 2 Acid2 Results" /></a> <a href="/images/blog/ff3/acid-ff3.png" title="Firefox 3 Acid2 Results" rel="lightbox[acid]"><img src="/images/blog/ff3/acid-ff3-th.png" alt="Firefox 3 Acid2 Results" /></a> <a href="/images/blog/ff3/acid-ie7.png" title="Internet Explorer 7 Acid2 Results" rel="lightbox[acid]"><img src="/images/blog/ff3/acid-ie7-th.png" alt="Internet Explorer 7 Acid2 Results" /></a> <span>From left to right: Firefox 2, Firefox 3, Internet Explorer 7. Click for larger image.</span> </div>
<p>Looks like we aren't going to have to test in <em>both</em> Firefox 2 and 3*.</p>
<p><small class="inset">* That is, unless you are using the newly-proprietary/implemented enhancements, such as getElementsByClassName <ins class="bl">ALSO</ins> While it is fantastic that the newest Firefox fixes CSS issues, it's not retroactive, so visitors still using FF2 will still have the same problems as before. I recommend waiting until usage is below 5% to completely phase it out.</small></p>
<p>So, here are what I consider to be the most important things for us Web Designer/Developers to be aware of.</p>
<h3>1) Full-Page Zoom</h3>
<p>This new scaling scales everything on the page (a la Opera and IE7), not just text. I wouldn't say this means that we can stop using em's for text sizing, but it's good to see that accessibility is beginning to become more supported by the software we use, so it isn't dependant on the designer.</p>
<div class="thumbrow">
<a href="/images/blog/ff3/zoom-ff2.gif" title="Firefox 2 Zoom (Animated Gif)" rel="lightbox[zoom]"><img src="/images/blog/ff3/zoom-ff2-th.png" alt="Firefox 2 Zoom" /></a>
<a href="/images/blog/ff3/zoom-ff3.gif" title="Firefox 3 Zoom (Animated Gif)" rel="lightbox[zoom]"><img src="/images/blog/ff3/zoom-ff3-th.png" alt="Firefox 3 Zoom" /></a>
<span>Left: Firefox 2 Zoom, Right: Firefox 3 Zoom. Click for larger image.</span>
</div>
<p>tracker: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4821">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4821</a></p>
<h3>2) Animated PNG (APNG) Support</h3>
<p>While I don't look forward to seeing alpha-transparent rotating "Email Me" graphics all over the place like it's 1998 again, I am very pleased to see APNG finally getting implemented. While it wont become a standard for quite a while, it's a step in the right direction. One thing to note is that if your browser does not support APNG (but does support PNG) it will simply render the first frame of the PNG.</p>
<div class="thumbrow" id="apngcontainer">
<img src="/images/blog/ff3/apng-animation.gif" alt="Animated GIF" />
<img src="/images/blog/ff3/apng-animation.png" alt="Animated PNG" />
<span>Left: Animated GIF, Right: Animated PNG<br />
Use the links below to change background color (JavaScript Required)<br />
<!-- Please forgive the obtrusive JS! -->
<a href="javascript:void(0)" title="Swap Color" onclick="document.getElementById('apngcontainer').style.backgroundColor='green'">Green</a> | <a href="javascript:void(0)" title="Swap Color" onclick="document.getElementById('apngcontainer').style.backgroundColor='pink'">Pink</a> | <a href="javascript:void(0)" title="Swap Color" onclick="document.getElementById('apngcontainer').style.backgroundColor='red'">Red</a> | <a href="javascript:void(0)" title="Swap Color" onclick="document.getElementById('apngcontainer').style.backgroundColor='blue'">Blue</a> | <a href="javascript:void(0)" title="Swap Color" onclick="document.getElementById('apngcontainer').style.backgroundColor='black'">Black</a> | <a href="javascript:void(0)" title="Swap Color" onclick="document.getElementById('apngcontainer').style.backgroundColor='orange'">Orange</a> | <a href="javascript:void(0)" title="Swap Color" onclick="document.getElementById('apngcontainer').style.backgroundColor='white'">White</a>
<br />
Image Credits go to http://www.gamani.com/apng.htm</span>
</div>
<p>tracker: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257197">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257197</a></p>
<!-- Please fogive the misplaced script tags! -->
<script type="text/javascript">
navigator.registerProtocolHandler('mailto', 'https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&#038;tf=0&#038;to=%s', 'Google Mail');
navigator.registerProtocolHandler('validate', 'http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=%s', 'W3C HTML Validation')
</script>
<h3>3) Support for arbitrary protocols</h3>
<p>This will allow you to map protocols such as <a href="mailto:nobody@nowhere.com" title="Test 'mailto' Protocol Handler">mailto:nobody@nowhere.com</a> (Which will use Gmail) or <a href="validate:http://www.phazm.com/" title="Test 'Validate' Protocol Handler">validate:http://www.phazm.com/</a> (Which will use the W3C validation service) to a proprietary handler, which will allow you to select it instead of only using the default.</p>
<div class="thumbrow">
<a href="/images/blog/ff3/handler.png" title="Protocol Handler UI" rel="lightbox"><img src="/images/blog/ff3/handler-th.png" alt="Protocol Handler UI" /></a>
<span>UI for notification/accepting Protocol Handlers. Click for larger image.</span>
</div>
<p>tracker: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372441">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372441</a></p>
<h3>4) getElementsByClassName</h3>
<p>This has been available for some time using some frameworks, but now it's in the DOM! Now we will be able to loop through all elements with a specific class on our document. The original specification is in the HTML 5 working draft. (link: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#getelementsbyclassname).</p>
<p>tracker: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357450">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357450</a></p>
<h3>5) Support for offline web apps</h3>
<p>The support has been added to allow web applications to be run offline.  Unfortunately, it will require the apps to accommodate this new system, and thus far, there has been no word from Google saying they intend to code Gmail or any of their other apps to be used offline, but I'm sure it will come in time.</p>
<p>Demo: <a href="http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/02/firefox-3-offline-app-demo/" rel="nofollow">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/02/firefox-3-offline-app-demo/</a><br />tracker: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367447">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367447</a></p>
<h3>Other useful additions:</h3>
<h4>Now properly supported:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18217"><code>display: inline-table</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9458"><code>display: inline-block</code></a></li>
</ul>
<h4>Added support for:</h4>
<ul>
<li><code>onCut</code></li>
<li><code>onCopy</code></li>
<li><code>onPaste</code></li>
<li><code>onBeforeCut</code></li>
<li><code>onBeforeCopy</code></li>
<li><code>onBeforePaste</code></li>
</ul>
<p>
demo: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=272228">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=272228</a><br />
tracker: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=280959">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=280959</a></p>
<h4>contentEditable</h4>
<p>contentEditable allows you to do inline editing of text.</p>
<p>demo: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=157048">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=157048</a><br />
tracker: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237964">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237964</a></p>
<h4>Resizable=<del>no</del><ins>yes</ins></h4>
<p>With Firefox 3 , the window.open property "resizable=no" is ignored, so all pop up windows will now be resizable.</p>
<p><a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick="window.open('http://www.google.com/', 'Can you resize?','width=100,height=100,resizable=no')">Click here to open a window with resizable=no</a><br />
tracker: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177838">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177838</a></p>
<h4>Long Tool tips</h4>
<p>Now, instead of having one huge line for a tool tip, they will wrap over several lines.</p>
<p>To test, hover over <abbr title="This is an intentionally long title attribute, which will wrap in Firefox 3, but not Firefox 2. This will allow you to create exceptionally descriptive alternate text for links and/or images, so you will no longer have any excuse. 'A picture means a thousand words' - I don't know if the tool tip will fit one thousand words, maybe one day I will find out.">this</abbr><br />
tracker: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218223">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218223</a></p>
<h4>Printing &amp; Absolute Position</h4>
<p>Containers that span multiple pages and are absolutely positioned will now correctly wrap to the next page instead of just being cut off.</p>
<p>tracker: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154892">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154892</a></p>
<h3>A few notes:</h3>
<p>By default, you will not be able to run any extensions that haven't been updated to be used with Firefox 3 . However, if you go into about:config, right click, then go to 'New' =&gt; '<code>Boolean</code>' - Enter, "<code>extensions.checkCompatibility</code>" and hit '<code>OK</code>' then click "<code>false</code>" and restart, you will be able to use the extensions that don't break.<br />
<strong>WARNING:</strong> Some extensions will actually crash Firefox 3, so if that happens, start up in safe mode with all extensions disabled, then either uninstall the extension(s) that are breaking it, or go set checkCompatibility to "true."</p>
<p><small>This is somewhat unrelated, but I don't want to make a new blog entry for it, and it is pretty useful: You can use <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5972">RAMBack</a> in Firefox 3 to free up a bunch of memory that it uses.</small></p>
<h3>Thanks for listening</h3>
<p>If you found this helpful or informative, I would really appreciate it if you left a comment... it gets so lonely at nights!</p>
<p><small>A <a href="http://digg.com/design/5_Ways_Firefox_3_will_affect_Web_Developers_pics_examples" title="Digg it">digg</a> wouldn't hurt either...</small></p>
<div class="adunit"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-5882049241465959";
google_ui_features = "rc:";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = "468x60text_image";
google_color_border = "FFFFFF";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "A3C088";
google_color_text = "333333";
google_color_url = "";

//--></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"></script>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.phazm.com/notes/browser-compatibility/firefox-3-web-developers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop the Hate &#8211; IE6 Isn&#8217;t So Bad!</title>
		<link>http://www.phazm.com/notes/productivity/stop-the-hate-ie6-isnt-so-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.phazm.com/notes/productivity/stop-the-hate-ie6-isnt-so-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 06:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hughes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[browser compatibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phazm.com/notes/uncategorized/stop-the-hate-ie6-isnt-so-bad/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have recently been getting mildly irritated at all of the "Just don't code for Internet Explorer 6 and people will stop using it" blog entries I've been seeing lately. I consider it a huge problem in the mentality of a designer when they disregard a large portion of visitors and/or customers. No disrespect to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have recently been getting mildly irritated at all of the "<a href="http://www.webdesignerwall.com/general/trash-all-ie-hacks/" rel="nofollow" title="Nick La - Web Designer Wall">Just don't code for Internet Explorer 6 and people will stop using it</a>" blog entries I've been seeing lately. I consider it a huge problem in the mentality of a designer when they disregard a large portion of visitors and/or customers. No disrespect to <a href="http://www.webdesignerwall.com/general/trash-all-ie-hacks/" rel="nofollow" title="Nick La's post on IE6">Nick La</a>, but simply "giving up" on IE6 is not (at this time) a viable solution, especially because IE6 still has the largest user base.</p>
<p>The fact is, IE6 is not that hard to code for, as long as you have a good understanding of Semantic XHTML, you shouldn't have much of a problem. In this post, I'm going to outline some of the steps you can take to reduce the time it takes to develop your pages for Internet Explorer 6.<br/>
</p>
<span id="more-5"></span>
<h4>The Stats</h4>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2007/October/browser.php" rel="nofollow" title="TheCounter.com Stats">TheCounter.com</a>, IE6 is at 50%, the next largest being IE7 at 24% and following that is FF, at 13%.</p>
<p class="img"><img src="http://www.phazm.com/images/blog/stop-hate-browser-stats.png" alt="TheCounter.com's Browser Statistics"/><br/>
<em>Bar graph showing top 3 browsers. -- Image courtesy of <a href="http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2007/October/browser.php" rel="nofollow" title="TheCounter.com Stats">TheCounter.com</a></em></p>
<p>Of course, these results will differ from your own website, which is a much better reference. For instance, according to <a href="http://www.phazm.com/" title="Phazm Webdesign">Phazm.com</a>'s statistics, IE7 is (very) slightly more used than IE6 -- 24.7% to 24.5%.</p>
<p>Either way you look at it, Internet Explorer 6 still constitutes a very large portion of visits. I don't know why anyone would suggest abandoning 25-50% of their traffic, but if you ask me, it's not a good decision. Read below for some tips on speeding up the entire process.</p>
<h4>Reset Your CSS</h4>
<p>There are two main differing behaviors in browsers: Their default rendering of HTML elements, and how they handle CSS. To start with, I recommend you always (or whenever possible) use a CSS Reset. Resetting the CSS takes away one of the differing behaviors between multiple browsers. For example, IE6 and Firefox both give &lt;p&gt; tags a default margin, however, that margin is slightly different between both browsers. When you eliminate that behavior, and set everything to have no default(browser) styling, you make your job a whole lot easier. <a href="http://meyerweb.com/" rel="nofollow" title="Eric Meyer">Eric Meyer</a> has created a fantastic CSS Reset which you can find <a href="http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2007/05/01/reset-reloaded/" rel="nofollow" title="Eric Meyer's Reset CSS">here</a>.
</p> 
<p>There are several ways you can use this CSS. I prefer to import it within my main/global CSS File.</p>
<p class="code">@import url("reset.css");</p>
<p>Simply put this at the top of the CSS file that is linked on every page on your site, and it will set nearly everything back to have no styling whatsoever. Obviously, there are downsides to doing this. The first is that you really need to start from a clean slate, because any elements that depend on the default margin of a header tag are going to break. The other downside is having to re-declare styles, such as making a list have bullets, making text within  italic, and so on.</p>
<h4>Conditional Comments</h4>
<p>Using conditional comments, most (if not all) CSS hacks can be avoided. Because we only have to worry about the rendering of the CSS, and not the default styling (due to using the CSS Reset) this can actually go quite fast.</p>
<p>Now, some say that you shouldn't use a conditional comment, due to it being proprietary Microsoft code, but I disagree. Not only does your page still validate, other browsers simply ignore the code - I have never had an instance where a properly formatted conditional comment went awry in any browser.</p>
<p>Here is the syntax for creating a conditional comment:</p>
<p class="code">&lt;!--[if (condition) IE (version)]&gt;<br />
Code to run<br />
&lt;![endif]--&gt;</p>
<p>Possible conditions/operators:</p>
<ul>
<li>lt = Less Than</li>
<li>lte =Less Than or Equal To</li>
<li>gt = greater than</li>
<li>gte = Greater Than or Equal To</li>
<li>! = Not</li>
</ul>
<p>Using the above operators, if you want to have a stylesheet for all Internet Explorers below IE7, you would put the following in your code within the  tags:</p>
<p class="code">&lt;!--[if lt IE 7]&gt;<br />
&lt;link rel="stylesheet" href="LegacyBrowser.css" type="text/CSS" /&gt;<br />
&lt;![endif]--&gt;</p>
<p>This will call a separate CSS file, called <span class="code">LegacyBrowser.css</span>, which will only affect IE versions below IE7.</p>
<h4>Styling the Page</h4>
<p>Now, get your page working in Firefox.  Once you have done that (completely) you open up your page in IE6, and start creating over-ride classes as necessary.  If <span class="code">.imagedisplay</span> is 3 pixels too far to the left, simply add in your LegacyBrowser.css:</p>
<p class="code">.imagedisplay { margin-right : -3px; }</p>
<p>or something similar, to get the desired effect.</p>
<p>Note that if you have already specified margin-right, you may need to add <span class="code">!important</span> to the mix, like so:</p>
<p class="code">.imagedisplay { margin-right : -3px !important; }</p>
<p>This is a very loose example, and in most cases you will simply replace a margin/padding with a slightly increased or decreased value, and use <span class="code">!important</span>.</p>
<p>In this way, you can avoid using CSS Hacks that could possibly break in future browsers, and you give yourself more control over how your page displays in Internet Explorer.</p>
<h4>Feedback</h4>
<p>I would love your comments regarding this topic. Do you agree that IE6 is still prevalent enough to be worth the additional coding time, or do you think it is a waste of time to cater to a dying browser? Let me know!</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.phazm.com/notes/productivity/stop-the-hate-ie6-isnt-so-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.207 seconds -->
